The election outcome that never was

Over the past few days I had it in the back of my mind to write a post to counter what I wrote last week about engaging with elections in stable countries.

Had I written that post I probably would have said something about how, even though elections are full of guff and silliness and we’re choosing between two relatively similar parties (Coke and Pepsi as one woman on the telly put it), it’s still important to engage in the process. I think I wanted to write that because I was feeling guilty about my compulsion to ignore the whole thing.

I must confess that I didn’t engage all that much this year. I listened to the news and watched the funny shows but I didn’t really engage. I decided to see the election as something happening around me. Instead of investing in the outcome, I would just sit back and see what happened. I vote in the very safe seat of Murray* so my lower house vote didn’t matter all that much either way but I voted above the line for the upper house, which is unprecedented political disengagement for me.

Now it looks like we’ll have a hung parliament which, if nothing else, slaps us in the face with a reminder of the dynamism of elections and party politics. In a funny twist, as my friends lament on twitter and facebook, discussing the best place to relocate when they abandon an Australia run by Tony Abbott, I’ve never been more keen to stay in Australia for a while. All of a sudden, it just got interesting.

Crazy stuff is happening, some good and some bad (and some things just so glorious that it makes all the craziness seem worth it). I’m keen to hang around, take a look, and maybe (with a very strong emphasis on maybe) get a bit more involved.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The election outcome that never was

  1. DavidA

    I always find it funny when the prospect of a hung parliament comes up, because I know that journalists will crank up their fear-mongering about it. The same thing happened in the British media before the UK elections earlier this year.

    From The Australian:

    Australia now faces a period of political instability and potentially weak government unprecedented since World War Two

    I note several scare-words there – “instability,” “weak government,” “unprecedented,” “World War Two.” After all, it must be serious if wwii gets a mention. Many countries have had hung parliaments for decades without having political instability. The idea that countries can go on perfectly fine without a majority government seems foreign to journalists. Given how disastrous government policies can be, maybe it could even be a good thing for governments to be unable to force any policy that they want into law.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s